Sta-Bil vs. Sea Foam

For general motorcycle related use, news, and observations.

Moderators: the2knights, Highway Rider

Post Reply
Ozymandias
Cruiser
Cruiser
Posts: 40
Joined: Sat May 24, 2014 12:48 am
10
Current bike(s): 2010 Kawasaki 1700 Voyager
Location: Nebraska
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 0

Sta-Bil vs. Sea Foam

Post by Ozymandias »

I see that Kawasaki recommends Sta-Bil in the gas for relatively short term (30-60 day) storage. I also notice that many people on these forums use Sea Foam as an additive. Are there differences that make one preferred over the other or are they really intended for somewhat different purposes? I have used the Sta-Bil product in the past although I normally ride through the winter with only about 10 to 20 days as the longest idle stretch. If this winter shapes up to be a rough one I want to use whatever will be best for my Voyager (2010).
1975 Goldwing (found a good home for it)
2003 Nomad 1500 (traded for the Voyager)
2010 Voyager 1700
voyager55
Elite Tourer
Elite Tourer
Posts: 820
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 6:08 am
11
Current bike(s): 2003 1200
Location: Eden Prairie, MN
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 3 times

Re: Sta-Bil vs. Sea Foam

Post by voyager55 »

Seafoam is a fuel system cleaner & fuel stabilizer. Use it during the riding season and for storage. 1 ounce per gallon.
It's good for a year when storing your bike etc.

Sta-bil is just for storage use.
lockwoodjohn
Traveler
Traveler
Posts: 135
Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2013 1:34 am
11
Current bike(s): 1995 Kawasaki 1200 Voyager VII
Location: Lockwood,New York
Has liked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: Sta-Bil vs. Sea Foam

Post by lockwoodjohn »

Hi Everyone,
Seafoam by far!!!! Will keep gas stable for up to a year. I use it in my lawn mowers,chainsaws, weedeaters, motorcycles. When my wife got her '99 Dodge ram it ran rough
Changed spark plugs, Ran better but not good enough. A friend of hers boyfriend ( a mechanic
? ) Listened to it and told my wire he would bring it to the dealership he works at because
it needs the fuel system cleaned (? ) I put 17 ounces of SF in a full tank of gas ran it half way through the tank truck runs a purrs like a kitten!!

SEA Foam All The Way!!!!
John
User avatar
SgtSlag
King of the Road
King of the Road
Posts: 1070
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 10:04 pm
14
Current bike(s): 1993 Voyager XII (2010)
(2006-2012: 1979 Honda CB750K)
(2008-2010: 1983 Kawasaki 440LTD, belt drive)
Location: Minnesota
Has liked: 23 times
Been liked: 249 times

Re: Sta-Bil vs. Sea Foam

Post by SgtSlag »

Actually, SeaFoam will stabilize gasoline for up to 18 months.

In addition to dissolving varnish deposits within the fuel system, SeaFoam will also aborb water within the fuel system. It can also be used within the crankcase to dissolve carbon deposits within the engine, and the transmission -- only need to treat the engine once, with modern oils, and regular changes. Older API oil standards (SH and earlier) would break down into carbon sludge within the engine, due to temperatures at/above 250 F.

SeaFoam is a great product which I've been using in my bikes since 2006, to mothball them for the Winter months. Come Spring, they fire up like they were parked the day before. Cheers!
:thmup:
SgtSlag

1993 Voyager XII
User avatar
debron
Past Board Member
Past Board Member
Posts: 1087
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2010 5:54 pm
14
Current bike(s): 1995 Voyager XII
Location: Stayton, Oregon (Close to)
Has liked: 0
Been liked: 1 time

Re: Sta-Bil vs. Sea Foam

Post by debron »

Yes, yes, ......seafoam......but what does stabil do same or different from seafoam??? I think that was the original question.
Ron in Oregon
AVA Webmaster ("master" is optimistic!)
AVA Board Member
1995 Voyager XII
Image
mikey
Cruiser
Cruiser
Posts: 46
Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2014 7:01 pm
10
Current bike(s): 2003 kaw voyager 1200
Location: Dayton Ohio
Has liked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: Sta-Bil vs. Sea Foam

Post by mikey »

i think voyager55 answered that question. :woohoo:
voyager55
Elite Tourer
Elite Tourer
Posts: 820
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 6:08 am
11
Current bike(s): 2003 1200
Location: Eden Prairie, MN
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 3 times

Re: Sta-Bil vs. Sea Foam

Post by voyager55 »

Ron doesn't read what I post because I own a 2003 which he says is prone to breakdowns and might explode at any minute :gig:
User avatar
debron
Past Board Member
Past Board Member
Posts: 1087
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2010 5:54 pm
14
Current bike(s): 1995 Voyager XII
Location: Stayton, Oregon (Close to)
Has liked: 0
Been liked: 1 time

Re: Sta-Bil vs. Sea Foam

Post by debron »

voyager55 wrote:Ron doesn't read what I post because I own a 2003 which he says is prone to breakdowns and might explode at any minute :gig:
What, it's still running? :gig: :gig:


Actually I did read the post. Question: If Stabil is just for storage, that implies you have to drain and replace your gas when you take your bike out of storage, yes, no??
Ron in Oregon
AVA Webmaster ("master" is optimistic!)
AVA Board Member
1995 Voyager XII
Image
User avatar
trikebldr
Elite Tourer
Elite Tourer
Posts: 749
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2014 8:34 pm
10
Current bike(s): '82 Kawasaki KZ750 Spectre
'82 Kawasaki KZ1100D Spectre
'84 Kawasaki Voyager 1300 with
'79 Vetter Terraplane sidecar
'85 Kawasaki Voyager 1300
2001 Kawasaki ZG1200 Voyager XII
Location: Independence, MO.
Has liked: 0
Been liked: 1 time

Re: Sta-Bil vs. Sea Foam

Post by trikebldr »

I read voyager's post as both will stabilize the fuel and [neither needs to be drained , but will burn through with the fuel] (blocked section added from my experiences). The big DIFFERENCE is that Seafoam will also clean the system as well.
User avatar
Tonyvdb
Grand Tourer
Grand Tourer
Posts: 530
Joined: Thu May 29, 2014 11:36 pm
10
Current bike(s): 2017 Victory Vision
1996 Voyager (Just sold)
1981 GPZ 550 (Previous bike)
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Has liked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: Sta-Bil vs. Sea Foam

Post by Tonyvdb »

Yup, thats correct. Seafoam also cleans as you drive where StaBil is only a stabliser.
2017 Gloss black Victory Vision
1996 Kawasaki Voyager Just sold
1981 Kawasaki GPZ550 (sold)
boscoe
Streetster
Streetster
Posts: 20
Joined: Tue Aug 06, 2013 10:08 pm
11
Current bike(s): 2011 Voyager
Location: Jefferson City, MO
Has liked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: Sta-Bil vs. Sea Foam

Post by boscoe »

The new Gumout Multi-System Tune-Up stuff works very well for me.

http://www.gumoutproveit.com/
2011 Voyager 1700
Ebony/Pearl Meteor Gray
Bridgestone Exedra Max tires in stock sizes
Kuryakyn Longhorn Offset Dually Highway Pegs
DEI Titanium exhaust header wrap
Polk Audio db521 speakers
Mobil 1 10W-40
User avatar
HawkeSHR
Cruiser
Cruiser
Posts: 99
Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2014 5:23 am
10
Current bike(s): 2008 Kawasaki KLR 650
1993 Kawasaki ZG1200
Location: Perkasie, PA
Has liked: 0
Been liked: 0
Contact:

Re: Sta-Bil vs. Sea Foam

Post by HawkeSHR »

Did not have a good experience with Sea Foam, had to have the carb purged. I'm not sure what happened but my dealership recommended I stay away from Sea Foam. I use Sta-Bil in my mowers and Snow Blower. My bikes I have very positive experiences with Startron (as both fuel additive during the riding season and for storage.).

Interesting reading the various perspectives, good to have choices.
Avid Commuter, MSF/PAMSP RiderCoach
My rides: 2008 Kawasaki KLR650, 1993 Kawasaki Voyager XII
Image
User avatar
SgtSlag
King of the Road
King of the Road
Posts: 1070
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 10:04 pm
14
Current bike(s): 1993 Voyager XII (2010)
(2006-2012: 1979 Honda CB750K)
(2008-2010: 1983 Kawasaki 440LTD, belt drive)
Location: Minnesota
Has liked: 23 times
Been liked: 249 times

Re: Sta-Bil vs. Sea Foam

Post by SgtSlag »

Care to share more details about your misfortune with SeaFoam? Do you know what it allegedly did to the carbs to prompt the dealer to recommend avoiding it? Were the carbs full of varnish, or was it some other issue? I'm curious what SeaFoam might have done (badly) in your particular situation. Knowledge is power, and forewarned, is for-armed. Cheers!
SgtSlag

1993 Voyager XII
cushman eagle
King of the Road
King of the Road
Posts: 2032
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2011 10:08 pm
14
Current bike(s): '99 Kawasaki Voyager 1200
1958 Cushman Eagle restoration has been finished,and have put 3030 miles on her!
Location: Orrville,Ohio
Has liked: 893 times
Been liked: 315 times

Re: Sta-Bil vs. Sea Foam

Post by cushman eagle »

I have used both Sta-Bil,or Sea Foam in bikes,mowers ,and antique tractors.I have never had a negative experience with either one. :thmup: :corn:
'99 Voyager VXII,'58 Cushman Eagle
User avatar
Mr Jensee
King of the Road
King of the Road
Posts: 1987
Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2008 5:55 pm
16
Current bike(s): Phone 337-781-8158
Home Phone disconnected.
Previous bikes. Yamaha 180, Honda CM200T, Suzuki 1000LNKawasaki ZRX1100.
Location: Lafayette, La
Has liked: 0
Been liked: 9 times

Re: Sta-Bil vs. Sea Foam

Post by Mr Jensee »

HawkeSHR wrote:Did not have a good experience with Sea Foam, had to have the carb purged. I'm not sure what happened but my dealership recommended I stay away from Sea Foam.
I have often found that if someone, even a dealership has had a bad experience with a product often that product is not recommended. Example, say someone brought a bike in to have the carbs cleaned and the owner tells the dealer he used Seafoam and it didn't work, then the dealer has the mechanic tear down the carbs to find they are severely gummed up. It is is reasonable that he assumed the product the owner used was crap. Then everyone who came in and said they used Seafoam, he would tell them to avoid using it. In reality if one doesn't use a product according to the instructions, or expects results immediately from that product, they more than likely will not use it again. I have used Stabil and Seafoam and highly recommend using either if you store a bike longer than 20 days without use. The present formulations of gas deteriorate rapidly due to the inclusion of ethanol as a oxidizer. Neither will bring a batch of old gas back to life if it is left in a tank to the point the fuel no longer smells like gasoline. I cringe everytime I watch on Velocity these shows where they find an old car in a junk yard and dump a new battery in it and start it with gas that has been in the tank for a long time. The damage that fuel can do can be serious. Always, always drain off the gas in a vehicle that has been sitting a year or more and put in fresh before you even crank it.
For Voyager XII Manuals click the link below.
https://1drv.ms/f/s!Ao3K0Ai2gvglgS3l7J4pBJrjfBhc
boscoe
Streetster
Streetster
Posts: 20
Joined: Tue Aug 06, 2013 10:08 pm
11
Current bike(s): 2011 Voyager
Location: Jefferson City, MO
Has liked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: Sta-Bil vs. Sea Foam

Post by boscoe »

The more I use the new GumOut, the more I like it! This stuff kicks Seafoam's butt! My car and truck have never idled any smoother, and my Voyager is so smooth and quick-starting. Even my John Deere garden tractor seems to run better with more power.

Check it out!
http://gumoutproveit.com/compare" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
2011 Voyager 1700
Ebony/Pearl Meteor Gray
Bridgestone Exedra Max tires in stock sizes
Kuryakyn Longhorn Offset Dually Highway Pegs
DEI Titanium exhaust header wrap
Polk Audio db521 speakers
Mobil 1 10W-40
User avatar
trikebldr
Elite Tourer
Elite Tourer
Posts: 749
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2014 8:34 pm
10
Current bike(s): '82 Kawasaki KZ750 Spectre
'82 Kawasaki KZ1100D Spectre
'84 Kawasaki Voyager 1300 with
'79 Vetter Terraplane sidecar
'85 Kawasaki Voyager 1300
2001 Kawasaki ZG1200 Voyager XII
Location: Independence, MO.
Has liked: 0
Been liked: 1 time

Re: Sta-Bil vs. Sea Foam

Post by trikebldr »

Boscoe, this is not to refute what you say about Gumout, because I like Gumout products, too, but I really don't like how misleading their little video of using Seafoam in a new car is. Sure, any oil in an additive will cause the white smoke, but where they go wrong is showing simple STAINS on top of the piston, not buildup. The whole video seems to be taking everything out of context to discredit Seafoam.

I wish I had a lighted borescope like they used. I would do a video of using an engine with 200,000 miles with lots of buildup. Also, they didn't show the differences between injectors using Seafoam, and not. or, the insides of an old carburetor before and after using Seafoam.

I don't argue that Gumout isn't as good, but why did they simply attack Seafoam out of context and not do a direct comparison with their own product under equal, and significant, conditions?
User avatar
HawkeSHR
Cruiser
Cruiser
Posts: 99
Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2014 5:23 am
10
Current bike(s): 2008 Kawasaki KLR 650
1993 Kawasaki ZG1200
Location: Perkasie, PA
Has liked: 0
Been liked: 0
Contact:

Re: Sta-Bil vs. Sea Foam

Post by HawkeSHR »

Mr Jensee wrote:
HawkeSHR wrote:Did not have a good experience with Sea Foam, had to have the carb purged. I'm not sure what happened but my dealership recommended I stay away from Sea Foam.
I have often found that if someone, even a dealership has had a bad experience with a product often that product is not recommended. Example, say someone brought a bike in to have the carbs cleaned and the owner tells the dealer he used Seafoam and it didn't work, then the dealer has the mechanic tear down the carbs to find they are severely gummed up. It is is reasonable that he assumed the product the owner used was crap. Then everyone who came in and said they used Seafoam, he would tell them to avoid using it. In reality if one doesn't use a product according to the instructions, or expects results immediately from that product, they more than likely will not use it again. I have used Stabil and Seafoam and highly recommend using either if you store a bike longer than 20 days without use. The present formulations of gas deteriorate rapidly due to the inclusion of ethanol as a oxidizer. Neither will bring a batch of old gas back to life if it is left in a tank to the point the fuel no longer smells like gasoline. I cringe everytime I watch on Velocity these shows where they find an old car in a junk yard and dump a new battery in it and start it with gas that has been in the tank for a long time. The damage that fuel can do can be serious. Always, always drain off the gas in a vehicle that has been sitting a year or more and put in fresh before you even crank it.
Maybe that was my problem. I did follow the directions but I was not using SF for storing my bike, I was still riding (I don't normally store my bike(s) because I ride all year when roads are clear (no snow ice, cold does not bother me with layers and heated gear). Thus, I used SF against its purpose; for storage and fuel preservation.

War Story alert... :corn:
To reply to Mr Jensee and SgtSlag: Points well taken but I will also add that the guys I had work on my bike at the time are guys I trust (they've never given me a reason not to - and I know dealerships can get a bad name, etc. but not these guys (years of great service and they never kill me on repair charges.) They've worked on thousands of bikes of all makes and models. At the time I did not have the time to delve into how SeaFoam was the culprit (or not) but they had no reason to take advantage. They picked me up, got me fixed quickly and did not even charge me for the tow and about $90 (no parts) for the service, they just recommended that I not use SF (they had seen problems with the product before) and recommended Startron, so I switched. I used SeaFoam because it was referred from another forum and used as directed on the container. Ended up having problems, carb clogged (this after using SF) and they purged it. I've been using Startron ever since (30+K miles) and not even a hint of a problem like I had then.

For those who use SeaFoam, I'm glad you did not have any problems.

Like I said previously - it is a good thing we have as many options as we have - great discussion! :thmup:
Avid Commuter, MSF/PAMSP RiderCoach
My rides: 2008 Kawasaki KLR650, 1993 Kawasaki Voyager XII
Image
User avatar
SgtSlag
King of the Road
King of the Road
Posts: 1070
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 10:04 pm
14
Current bike(s): 1993 Voyager XII (2010)
(2006-2012: 1979 Honda CB750K)
(2008-2010: 1983 Kawasaki 440LTD, belt drive)
Location: Minnesota
Has liked: 23 times
Been liked: 249 times

Re: Sta-Bil vs. Sea Foam

Post by SgtSlag »

Thanks for the additional information. You are correct, mechanics see far more bikes than most of us ever will. Glad you found some decent mechanics to work with. That can be a challenge. I, too, found some very decent shop folks to work with. Building a good, working relationship with them has been a tremendous asset for me -- one that I value very highly.

Regarding Startron products, I've also heard great things about them. I've only used a couple of Startron products, thus far, and only on a few occasions. Thanks for sharing your experiences. Cheers!
SgtSlag

1993 Voyager XII
User avatar
Mr Dion
Streetster
Streetster
Posts: 25
Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2014 10:40 pm
10
Current bike(s): 2003 Honda Goldwing GL 1800
Location: Janesville, WI
Has liked: 0
Been liked: 0
Contact:

Re: Sta-Bil vs. Sea Foam

Post by Mr Dion »

Seafoam in both of my bikes
In God We Trust Dion Liphart
Post Reply

Return to “General Chat”